An article about guns in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel…

September 24th, 2007

…that’s not negative?

Entry Filed under: Media

5 Comments Add your own

  • 1. grumps  |  September 24th, 2007 at 10:35 am

    Harrumph. I’ve bought a gun at Astle’s in Baraboo and for him to say “Guys could give a rat’s butt what their gun looks like.” is just plain wrong.

    A gun that is pleasing to the eye is probably pleasing to the hand as well. Function follows form and all that. That’s not to say that ugly guns don’t work, just that most guys want the etched shotgun and keep it well-oiled sitting in their gun safes.

  • 2. Elliot  |  September 24th, 2007 at 10:41 am

    You know, I thought the same thing when I read that line.

    I’ve seen way too many guys lusting after some slab of stainless steel to think looks don’t matter.

  • 3. Chris  |  September 24th, 2007 at 4:44 pm

    I agree I have seen guys at the range with the high end shotguns who treat them better than they treat their wives lol

    Wiping them down with a cloth diaper after every shot lol

  • 4. Dean  |  September 25th, 2007 at 1:32 pm

    What? I always wipe my wife down with a cloth diaper.

  • 5. Elliot  |  September 25th, 2007 at 2:04 pm

    See, Dean, that falls under the category of “too much information.” ;)

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.