Quoted without comment, but with some admiration:

April 8th, 2011

Justice David Prosser appeared on Fox News Thursday night and told host Greta Van Sustern, viagra canada ask “I’m not conceding, tadalafil and I’m not congratulating. And I’m not claiming victory.”

“We’re simply waiting out the process,”┬áProsser added.

via Prosser: “I’m not conceding, and I’m not congratulating. And I’m not claiming victory” – JSOnline.

Entry Filed under: Observations

9 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Roland Melnick  |  April 9th, 2011 at 1:10 am

    Certainly a more measured, reasoned response. By contrast, Kloppenburg rushed to a conclusion based on a 204 vote lead in a race with about 1.5 million votes cast.

  • 2. John Foust  |  April 9th, 2011 at 10:44 am

    You don’t think her speech was measured and civil?

  • 3. Elliot  |  April 11th, 2011 at 9:42 am

    Let’s just say, it was premature, John. :)

  • 4. Roland Melnick  |  April 14th, 2011 at 5:38 pm

    Do you think J-Klop’s response was reasonable given the circumstances?

  • 5. Dan  |  April 15th, 2011 at 12:45 am

    To Roland, of course it was reasonable for a dishonest person. The Kloppenberg campaing had to know something was wrong on election night because some blogger commentators (not blog owners) knew something was wrong. So she tried to embarrass the clerk in Waukesha County into not revealing the mistake.
    She guessed wrong.
    While the clerk in Waukeash County screwed up big time, she was honest enough to admit she made a mistake and said she was responsible for the mistake.
    The Democrats and liberals on the other hand, were not that honest and continue to be dishonest. They have made a lot of accusations but with no substance or evidence to the allegations.

  • 6. John Foust  |  April 15th, 2011 at 7:40 am

    Wow, Dan, that’s an amazing twist of logic: JoKlo knew the Brookfield votes hadn’t been tallied by Nickolaus because she had nothing better to do the night of the election than read a blog comment on Fairly Conservative, divine its true meaning, and attempted to use her magical powers to hide those votes without actually having any contact with Nickolaus or the clerk in Brookfield.

  • 7. Dan  |  April 15th, 2011 at 11:52 am

    Umm, John, if some bloggers out there knew something was wrong, I am sure Kloppenberg knew, unless she and her campaign are not that smart.

  • 8. John Foust  |  April 15th, 2011 at 3:36 pm

    I find it highly improbable that either Supreme Court campaign staff was sitting around pressing “refresh” on Cindy’s blog just in case there might be some insight into the vote count. Utterly bizarre. The day after? Maybe someone skims.

  • 9. Roland Melnick  |  April 16th, 2011 at 7:22 pm

    As Elliot said, her victory declaration was premature. Ultimately, it will prove inconsequential. The results have been made official and Prosser’s margin will prove insurmountable, even for Al Franken’s former operatives.

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Being in a wheelchair gives you a unique perspective on the world. This blog features many of my views on politics, art, science, and entertainment. My name is Elliot Stearns. More...

The Abortionist

Recent Comments