JS Online: Editorial: An unnecessary amendment

December 1st, 2005

In the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel’s editorial entitled An unnecessary amendment , tadalafil recipe they came out against the possibility of a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage in Wisconsin.

They even quoted Attorney General Peg Lautenschlager’s statement that “Wisconsin law already clearly defines marriage as a union between a man and a woman.”

Now, hospital let me point out that I’m not in favor of the amendment.

However, the Journal Sentinel editorial board get’s a special Golden Rule Breaker citation for hypocrisy. They KNOW that the Wisconsin state supreme court could easily (and probably eventually will) declare that law unconstitutional.

It’s one thing to be against the proposed amendment.

It’s another thing to mislead people into thinking they don’t NEED the amendment because it’s already the law.

Entry Filed under: Golden Rule Breakers,Milwaukee

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


About

Being in a wheelchair gives you a unique perspective on the world. This blog features many of my views on politics, art, science, and entertainment. My name is Elliot Stearns. More...

The Abortionist

Recent Comments

Categories

Meta