I’ll be stunned if we ever get the right to use one.

September 5th, 2006

Imagine a non-lethal stun gun that didn’t need wires and could shoot accurately and effectively at a range of over almost 500 feet…

The sad thing is ‚Äì why I can easily imagine such a device ‚Äì I can’t imagine the political left ever conceeding us the right to carry one for self-defense.

Entry Filed under: Observations,Politics

5 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Billiam  |  September 5th, 2006 at 3:32 pm

    You don’t need a stun gun. They now have directed energy weapons. It’ll make people run… It heats a point on your skin VERY rapidly.

  • 2. Aaron  |  September 5th, 2006 at 4:17 pm

    You’re right. You’ll never get one.

    Police train to use them and they still manage to kill people.

  • 3. Administrator  |  September 5th, 2006 at 4:25 pm

    But they kill them a lot less often than they do if they shoot them with a bullet.

  • 4. Billiam  |  September 5th, 2006 at 4:56 pm

    I don’t know. Ever read news stories where the cops fired 40 or 50 rounds, and only get 1-5 hits? They use automatics, spray and pray mentality. I read an account once of 2 cops in LA who pulled a guy over. He came out with a .357, they pull their 9mm’s. He fires 6 rounds, 5 hits. They fire 40, 1 hit. Spray and pray is deadly to by-standers. Gun control is hitting your target. Not enough emphasis on that.

  • 5. jp  |  September 6th, 2006 at 4:04 pm

    “The present invention provides a non-lethal projectile”.
    One more time, non-lethal.
    However, the left will be concerned about making someone feel uncomfortable.

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


About

Being in a wheelchair gives you a unique perspective on the world. This blog features many of my views on politics, art, science, and entertainment. My name is Elliot Stearns. More...

The Abortionist

Recent Comments

Categories

Meta