I’d point out this psycho didn’t need a gun…

February 12th, 2011

…to kill four people in a stabbing spree, tadalafil viagra but then someone will point out he could have killed more with a gun.

The whole argument just wears me out.

Entry Filed under: Gun Control

13 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Dan  |  February 12th, 2011 at 5:52 pm

    Of course, if New York had more liberal (conservative?) gun laws, maybe a bystander or victim could have stopped the madness.
    But I am sure the liberals here will try to say I am wrong.

  • 2. John Foust  |  February 12th, 2011 at 11:40 pm

    No, no, no, Dan. Run with it. Let’s write the movie script and show people how only the good guys will have the best aim, no bystander misinterprets the situation when they too unholster, and only the bad guys get taken out.

  • 3. TerryN  |  February 13th, 2011 at 9:48 pm

    Pretty hard to misinterpret a guy with knife running around and fatally stabbing people who are trying to run away from him.

  • 4. Dan  |  February 14th, 2011 at 12:13 am

    Well, John, I live in Vegas and because of open carry, at least 10 thugs have gone to the other side because they thought they could get away with violence and they thought wrong. I have also not heard of a case of where someone was killed or even shot because of bad aim by cc holder. Maybe in Vegas, we are better shooters than else where.

  • 5. BobG  |  February 14th, 2011 at 10:06 am

    More innocent people are shot by police than by people with CCW’s.

  • 6. Dan  |  February 14th, 2011 at 10:21 am

    Liberals like John always think the worst of people. I guess liberals like John just can’t be happy unless they think bad things about people.

  • 7. John Foust  |  February 15th, 2011 at 3:32 pm

    Remarkably, we rarely hear stories from the people the dolphins push out to sea.

  • 8. Roland Melnick  |  February 17th, 2011 at 12:59 am

    Only someone with a parochial view of the issue (and life in general) would claim that legal concealed carry coming to Wisconsin would bring with it a Dodge City type of atmosphere. What about the other 48 States that allow it? Boy…that New Hampshire must be a dangerous place to live!

  • 9. John Foust  |  February 17th, 2011 at 11:26 am

    Like I said: In your movie, the bad guys have poor aim and fall down immediately. There’s always an armed good guy in the crowd with miraculous aim. No innocents get hit, too. The more lead in the air, the merrier!

  • 10. Roland Melnick  |  February 17th, 2011 at 12:47 pm

    You are the only one talking movies here, John.

  • 11. John Foust  |  February 17th, 2011 at 1:32 pm

    I didn’t bring up Dodge City. I just point out that whenever these situations arise, there’s always some gun-fondler who spins a fanciful yarn about how if they’d been there with their side-arm, they would’ve made it right, just like in the movies. In this case, it was Dan in the first post.

  • 12. Roland Melnick  |  February 17th, 2011 at 3:29 pm

    Dan’s exact quote was “maybe a bystander or victim could have stopped the madness.”

    Hardly the Quentin Tarrantino-esque bit of violent Hollywood braggadocio, but you always did prefer to misrepresent what people say to suit your needs.

  • 13. John Foust  |  February 17th, 2011 at 5:05 pm

    Maybe another bystander would’ve misjudged the situation and shot the first bystander. Maybe the third bystander would miss and hit another bystander who hadn’t had time to lock and load. Maybe a cheeseburger Royale would fall from the sky and knock out the bad guy. This is quite an interesting movie! I can’t wait to spot the shot from inside the trunk of the car. Quentin always does that. I hear his next movie reflexively blames everything on Teh Libruls.

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.