I’d be a lot less critical…

December 16th, 2008

..of this Liberal’s call to kill the filibuster, sildenafil shop if I believed for a second that he would be in favor of killing it if the Democrats were still in the minority.

Entry Filed under: Blogs,Politics

5 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Nick  |  December 16th, 2008 at 1:19 pm

    Of course, you can say that Republicans are political hacks just like the Democrats. Take for instance this one, who was calling to abolish the filabuster when it was used by Democrats to block judicial appointments, and is now saying he’ll use it against Obama.

  • 2. elliot  |  December 16th, 2008 at 1:25 pm

    Actually, I don’t give a shit which side you’re on.

    Unfair is unfair.

  • 3. Zach W.  |  December 16th, 2008 at 1:40 pm

    I was against the “nuclear option” when it was floated by Republicans when they still had the Senate majority, and I’m still opposed to getting rid of the filibuster now, no matter who’s running the Senate these days.

  • 4. elliot  |  December 16th, 2008 at 2:11 pm

    Glad to hear that, Zach.

    But, I’m not bothered by people who are consistent.

    You could be consistently for the fillibuster or consistently against it and I’d respect you the same way. (And I’ll apologize to this poster if he says he’s always been against it.)

    But I can’t abide people when they’re for or against something depending on how it advantages them.

  • 5. Zach W.  |  December 16th, 2008 at 2:21 pm

    Unfortunately Elliot, that’s what politics has become – it’s more about how something can be politically advantageous as opposed to how it might be good for regular folks.

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


About

Being in a wheelchair gives you a unique perspective on the world. This blog features many of my views on politics, art, science, and entertainment. My name is Elliot Stearns. More...

The Abortionist

Recent Comments

Categories

Meta