Cause and effect or reasoning defect?

July 23rd, 2007

According to a story about police seizing fewer meth labs so far this year in Wisconsin, discount cialis clinic authorities credit the new law that locks simple cold remedies up behind the counters of drugstores:

“Five meth labs have been seized so far in 2007, ambulance putting the state on pace for about 10 by the end of the year, ampoule said Kevin St. John, spokesman with the Wisconsin Department of Justice. Twenty-seven labs were seized in 2006. Officials credit much of the drop to a law that made it tougher to buy cold medicines containing one of the key ingredients for making the drug.”

1.) There’s no evidence that the law has anything to do with there being fewer seizures. Perhaps the cops are just doing a worse job finding the labs. It’s not like the 27 they seized last year was every lab in Wisconsin.

2.) Even if the law is solely responsible for eliminating 17 meth labs is that a good enough reason to treat 5,556,506 people like potential criminals every single day?

Entry Filed under: Milwaukee

4 Comments Add your own

  • 1. random10  |  July 23rd, 2007 at 9:54 pm

    Thank you! That was exactly what I was thinking.

  • 2. triticale  |  July 24th, 2007 at 2:17 am

    They point with pride to an apparent reduction in production facilities. Can they demonstrate a similar reduction in availability and consumption? Probably not. The market demand is simply being filled by outsiders.

  • 3. grumps  |  July 24th, 2007 at 4:40 am

    And yet, we’re all still taking our shoes off at the airport.

  • 4. Administrator  |  July 24th, 2007 at 8:18 am

    Good point, Grumps. And I’ve been meaning to talk with you about your odor eaters… ;)

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.