January 3rd, 2011

At first, cialis generic viagra I thought the 5, viagra cialis 000 birds that fell from the sky in Arkansas were a result of a flock flying into a stealthed alien mothership.

But that doesn’t explain the 100,000 dead fish floating in the Arkansas river.

If frogs start falling from the sky this week, you’ll find me at my local Catholic church working on my rosary.

Entry Filed under: Observations

14 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Nick  |  January 3rd, 2011 at 12:22 pm

    You think you could make it inside a church without being struck by lightning?

  • 2. Elliot  |  January 3rd, 2011 at 12:26 pm

    I thought Odin used thunderbolts. Wasn’t Jehovah more partial to floods and plagues?

  • 3. BobG  |  January 3rd, 2011 at 6:44 pm

    I’m sure someone will find a way to blame it on Bush.

  • 4. John Foust  |  January 3rd, 2011 at 11:31 pm

    With Cathy Stepp at the DNR, maybe we can have this in Wisconsin, too. Then we’ll be as enviromental as Arkansas. I’m sure it’ll be much more cost-effective to eradicate the wildlife than to conserve it.

  • 5. Dan  |  January 4th, 2011 at 10:57 am

    Of course, john, it sounds like the birds were caught up in weather and were violently killed. So, I am sure Cathy Stepp can contrl the weather. My she is good. But pesky little facts sure can’t get in the way of a cheap shot, now can they.

  • 6. John Foust  |  January 4th, 2011 at 11:39 am

    I dunno, Dan. Go ahead, explain to me how you or Cathy Stepp will perform a cost-benefit analysis on the value of a flock of birds, a clean stream, or undeveloped land.

  • 7. TerryN  |  January 4th, 2011 at 2:36 pm

    Which state has the nickname, The Natural State?

    Another cheap shot in 5,4,3,2,1…

  • 8. Dan  |  January 4th, 2011 at 4:39 pm

    Let’s see, a loss of birds. Probably a profit for the farmers in the area.
    If you have read, the deaths in the rivers were natural. Cost: none
    Reading Foust’s comedy nonesense: priceless.

  • 9. John Foust  |  January 4th, 2011 at 6:27 pm

    Really, Dan? Do birds help or hurt farmers? Does it depend on the bird? What about the value of a clean stream? Should we require a two-year or a three-year payback on investment on that?

  • 10. Dan  |  January 4th, 2011 at 8:48 pm

    Any evidence that the stream was dirty? From what I read, it was disease. And they are still fishing in the river for bass and crappie and even catfish. Darn those dirty streams. So dirty that people are still fishing in them.
    Do some reading, John. Learn the facts.

  • 11. JJ  |  January 5th, 2011 at 2:41 am

    I blame Bill Clinton!

  • 12. John Foust  |  January 5th, 2011 at 9:40 am

    I’m not talking about Arkansas and the birds and fishes. Let science do its work to find the answers.

    I’m talking about policy, direction, intention. Read what I wrote. What’s the value of a clean water supply? How do you calculate a return on investment on that?

  • 13. Elliot  |  January 5th, 2011 at 11:03 am

    I’m starting to think the whole thing is a promotion for the next M. Night Shyamalan movie.

  • 14. John Foust  |  January 5th, 2011 at 1:49 pm

    Come now. Stepp isn’t that scary.

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.